One of the Constitutional Court's powers under the 1945 Constitution is to decide disputes over the results of general elections, known in Indonesian as perselisihan hasil pemilihan umum (PHPU). The Court hears these cases at the first and final level, and its decisions are final and binding, which means there is no appeal. This is separate from the Court's power of judicial review of laws.
What is, and is not, a results dispute
A PHPU case concerns the official determination of election results by the General Elections Commission (KPU) and whether that determination should be annulled or corrected. Other election problems are handled elsewhere: administrative violations and ethics complaints go to the election supervisory and ethics bodies, administrative decisions can be challenged in the administrative courts, and election crimes are handled under criminal procedure. Understanding which forum is the right one is often the first question in an election matter.
Types of elections
The Court's authority covers different elections, and the procedural rules differ between them. These include the election of the President and Vice President, members of the national and regional legislatures, and regional members of the Regional Representative Council (DPD). Regional head elections (governors, regents, and mayors) are governed by a separate legal framework with its own deadlines and requirements. For this reason, the applicable Constitutional Court procedural regulation for the specific election must always be checked.
Who may file
Only parties with legal standing may bring a case. Depending on the election, this generally means participants in that election, such as political parties, individual candidates, or presidential and vice-presidential candidate pairs. Petitions are filed by the party themselves or through an advocate acting under a power of attorney.
The deadline
The filing period is extremely short. For legislative and DPD elections, a petition must generally be submitted within three times twenty-four hours after the KPU announces the nationally determined results, and a similar short period applies to presidential election disputes. Petitions filed after the deadline are dismissed on formal grounds, without the Court examining the substance, and this has also happened in regional election disputes. Preparation therefore has to begin well before results are announced.
How the process generally unfolds
- Filing — the petition is submitted to the Court, including through its online system, followed by submission of the original documents within the permitted period
- Completeness check and correction — the Court reviews whether the petition meets formal requirements, and a short window may allow corrections
- Registration and hearings — the case is registered and hearings are held in which the KPU responds as the respondent, and other parties, such as the election supervisory body or other affected parties, may take part
- Evidence — documents, witnesses, and expert testimony are presented, with a strong focus on showing how alleged irregularities affected the result
- Decision — the Court may grant the petition, reject it, or declare it inadmissible, within the short decision periods set by law
Why petitions often fail
- The petition is filed late
- The petitioner cannot show legal standing for that type of election
- The petition describes irregularities in general terms but does not connect them to a difference in the results
- The evidence is incomplete, poorly organized, or not presented within the schedule set by the Court
Where legal counsel typically assists
Counsel can assess standing and the applicable procedural rules and deadline, prepare the petition and the supporting evidence, organize witnesses and experts, and represent the party in hearings that proceed at a rapid pace. In disputes where timing is this tight, early legal involvement is often the difference between a petition being heard on its merits and being rejected on procedure.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Election laws and Constitutional Court procedural regulations are updated periodically and differ between types of elections. For guidance on a specific matter, please consult directly with Paramarta Advocaten.